Measuring the True Cost of Active Management by Mutual Funds

Measuring the True Cost of Active Management by Mutual Funds

Miller, Ross M., "Measuring the True Cost of Active Management by Mutual Funds" (June 2005).

Abstract:

Recent years have seen a dramatic shift from mutual funds into hedge funds even though hedge funds charge management fees that have been decried as outrageous. While expectations of superior returns may be responsible for this shift, this article shows that mutual funds are more expensive than commonly believed. Mutual funds appear to provide investment services for relatively low fees because they bundle passive and active funds management together in a way that understates the true cost of active management. In particular, funds engaging in closet or shadow indexing charge their investors for active management while providing them with little more than an indexed investment. Even the average mutual fund, which ostensibly provides only active management, will have over 90% of the variance in its returns explained by its benchmark index. This article derives a method for allocating fund expenses between active and passive management and constructs a simple formula for finding the cost of active management. Computing this active expense ratio requires only a fund's published expense ratio, its R-squared relative to a benchmark index, and the expense ratio for a competitive fund that tracks that index. At the end of 2004, the mean active expense ratio for the large-cap equity mutual funds tracked by Morningstar was 7%, over six times their published expense ratio of 1.15%. More broadly, funds in the Morningstar universe had a mean active expense ratio of 5.2%, while the largest funds averaged a percent or two less.

Here are some quotes from our visitors about the value of a MBA ... MBA will help you accelerate your foreclosure investing business to its fullest potential in the next years. ... MBA will help you get ahead in today's global marketplace through a strong, in-depth curriculum that balances core courses with experience. ... MBA will help facilitate the orchard, a planned development district with agricultural and natural areas and five single-family homes for low income.

Facts on MBA In the United States, by one estimate, the average cost of earning an MBA via an accredited full-time program (excluding room and board) rose from $124,000 in 1993 to $162,000 in 2001 (see Davies and Cline, 2005). The bulk of the cost is in the form of foregone earnings ($109,000 in 1993 and $139,000 in 2001). Accounting for the decrease in expected unemployment as well as the increase in expected wages and expected wage growth, the financial benefits to holding an MBA degree are the equivalent of an 18% rate of return on the cost of the degree (see Davies and Cline, 2005). New business schools at Saïd Business School (Oxford) and Judge Business School (Cambridge) joined the London Business School and other UK BAs in the Financial Times league table in 2000, an indication that the MBA degree is proving to be as widely accepted and successful in Europe as in the USA.

This site is growing and will contain info on subjects like mba degree, mba jobs and online mba program.